e{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$
> \stoptext
>
> The result with the latest ConTeXt version:
>
>
>
> and with the version from a year ago:
>
>
>
> I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and
> position of the \vec arrow, especially with single le
ollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters.
GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
What is the rat
el
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:45 PM Alexandre Christe via ntg-context
> wrote:
> >
> > I confirm the behavior.
> >
> > Also possibly linked is that the spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$
> seems pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
> &g
he spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$ seems
> pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
>
>
>
> Le ven. 20 janv. 2023 à 14:37, Alan Braslau via ntg-context
> a écrit :
>>
>> MWE:
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> $\vec{k}$
>>
>> \s
I confirm the behavior.
Also possibly linked is that the spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$ seems
pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
Le ven. 20 janv. 2023 à 14:37, Alan Braslau via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> a écrit :
> MWE:
>
> \starttext
>
> $\
{AB}$
\stoptext
The result with the latest ConTeXt version:
GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
and with the version from a year ago:
GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and
position
,shorten >=-1pt] (arg.north west) -- (arg.north east);
\stoptikzpicture
}
\starttext
\m{x + z_{\vector{U}} + x}
\m{x + \mathord{\vector{U}}^^z + x}
\m{x + \overrightarrow{U}^^z + x}
\stoptext
-
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d
{a+b+c+d} \quad
53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
58 $\overbar
verleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
>> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
>> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>>
>> % so far
>>
>> \setupmathstackers
>> [both] % v
% so far
\setupmathstackers
[both] % vfenced]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overrightarrow {i}$
rs
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overrightarrow {i}$
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a
\quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
\stoptext
Wo
> \setupmathstackers
> [top]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [bottom]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \starttext
>
> $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underb
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
}}
There might be a better way to achieve that in Context, I don't know.
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
\starttabulate[|l|lm|]
\NC \tex{overleftarrow} \NC \overleftarrow{top} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overrightarrow} \NC \overrightarrow{text} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overleftrightarrow
} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overrightarrow} \NC \overrightarrow{text} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overleftrightarrow} \NC \overleftrightarrow{text} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overtwoheadleftarrow} \NC \overtwoheadleftarrow{text} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overtwoheadrightarrow} \NC \overtwoheadrightarrow
Mono] [feature=none]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [math] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math][scale=1..12]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
$
\overrightarrow{AB}
\overrightarrow{BA}
\overrightarrow{AC}
\overrightarrow{CA}
\overrightarrow{AD}
\overrightarrow{DA}
\overrightarrow{BC}
\overrightarrow
][scale=1..12]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
$
\overrightarrow{AB}
\overrightarrow{BA}
\overrightarrow{AC}
\overrightarrow{CA}
\overrightarrow{AD}
\overrightarrow{DA}
\overrightarrow{BC}
\overrightarrow{CB}
\overrightarrow{BD}
\overrightarrow{DB}
\overrightarrow{CD}
\overrightarrow{DC
] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math][scale=1.12]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
$
\overrightarrow{AB}
\overrightarrow{BA}
\overrightarrow{AC}
\overrightarrow{CA}
\overrightarrow{AD}
\overrightarrow{DA}
\overrightarrow{BC}
\overrightarrow{CB}
\overrightarrow{BD}
\overrightarrow{DB}
\overrightarrow{CD
On 3/2/2013 1:11 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I have an issue with \overrightarrow being positioned under its
argument. I've read on the list that this is now fixed, but... I
can't upgrade! This is because I'm preparing a document in an
incremental way, that is, I'm preparing course materials
Hi all,
I have an issue with \overrightarrow being positioned under its
argument. I've read on the list that this is now fixed, but... I
can't upgrade! This is because I'm preparing a document in an
incremental way, that is, I'm preparing course materials (problem
sets) for the next class each
documentation is.
regards
Keith.
Am 27.01.2013 um 21:40 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 1/27/2013 5:24 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Dear list,
\starttext
text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
\stoptext
gives smaller letters since some time ago under the arrow. See the
attached pdf
Dear list,
\starttext
text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
\stoptext
gives smaller letters since some time ago under the arrow. See the
attached pdf files for the output of different versions of context
(test.pdf is compiled with the latest beta).
I think the look in test20121210.pdf is the right
On 1/27/2013 5:24 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Dear list,
\starttext
text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
\stoptext
gives smaller letters since some time ago under the arrow. See the
attached pdf files for the output of different versions of context
(test.pdf is compiled with the latest beta).
I
On 27 janv. 2013, at 21:40, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
[…]
fixed. some more info about the updated mkiv arrow related mechanisms can be
found in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/about.pdf
(btw, one needs the latest greatest lm/gyre math fonts)
Hans
This is an amazing
Dear all.
The following short sample gives a under right arrow instead of over right
arrow.
Would you please check it?
\starttext
$\overrightarrow{AB}$
\stoptext
Thanks.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
ConTeXt ver: 2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.8 int: english/english
right arrow instead of over right
arrow.
Would you please check it?
\starttext
$\overrightarrow{AB}$
\stoptext
Thanks.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
ConTeXt ver: 2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.8 int: english/english
Dear Rogers,
It works fine after updating.
Thank you for checking.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost graphic,
but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
This seems to broken for extensible math
Hi Taco,
Have you tried the new current yet? There was a whole bunch of extra
\unexpanded-s in it already.
You're right, thanks! I had built the new context but forgot to install it on
this particular machine :-)
Sorry for the noise,
Matthijs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost graphic,
but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
To illustrate the problem, I've created the following simple testcase
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\let\normaloverrightarrow\overrightarrow
\unexpanded\def\overrightarrow{\normaloverrightarrow}
ok, i made them all unexpandable
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
}})$
avec une vitesse
$\dot{x}...
I have absolutely no idea what it is trying to say to me...
If related, the macro is defined by
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
Regards,
--
Flavien.
Quantum objects are completely crazy
décrit l'axe $({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
avec une vitesse
$\dot{x}...
I have absolutely no idea what it is trying to say to me...
If related, the macro is defined by
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
Can you create a minimum example. This runs
In the following example, it is the ; that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
2009/5/13 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
Dear all, I
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ; that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
Taco, the error also occurs with cambria. So, by your
Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ; that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
math-noa.lua:
if nc == po then
local last_noad = next_noad.next
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ; that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
Taco, the error also occurs
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Jesse Alama wrote:
Something goes wrong with this simple example:
\definematharrow needs three arguments, the second is bunch
of digits representing distance corrections. See the My Way on arrows and
math-ext.tex.
\definemathoverarrow [overrightarrow
Something goes wrong with this simple example:
--- snip ---
\definemathoverarrow [overrightarrow] [\rightarrowfill]
\def\Ray#1{\overrightarrow{#1}}
\starttext
Hello world! $\Ray{ABC}$.
\stoptext
--- snip ---
It leads to:
! Missing $ inserted.
inserted text
$
to be read
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an
interface to easily define such commands. So
If not, what can I do so that I can use it?
ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow
the \overleftarrow and
\overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
\overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to
denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this
isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least, it is not available by
default. I tried
. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
\overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
\overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to
denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this
isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an
interface to easily define such commands. So
If not, what can I do so that I can use it?
ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow as defined in plain
tex. This does not work
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
\overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
\overleftrightarrow
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Jesse Alama wrote:
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
\overrightarrow commands, but one thing
the most appropriate place in the wiki tu put that example there, but
I really think that you should put it in one if your manuals as a
really nice example.
Mojca
PS: I have another nice math challenge for you or Taco ;)
(a hybrid of overline/overrightarrow/vec/overrigharpoonup for
denoting vectors
Hi all,
I use \setupindenting[medium,yes] in my document.
When I use:
\placeformula[GiPivel]
\startformula
\frac{\overrightarrow{G_iP_i}}{\Delta T} = \frac{d_i.\vec{y_i} +
\delta_i.\vec{t_i}}{\Delta T} = -\dot
\longrightharpoonup{\relbar\joinrel\rightharpoonup}
\def\longleftharpoondown{\leftharpoondown\joinrel\relbar}
% slightly longer line which didn't work: it this looks ugly
% probably a definition, similar as in \overrightarrow
% would help producing longer harpoons
%
% \def\longrightharpoonup{\relbar
53 matches
Mail list logo
